AI evaluation for grants programs.
Treasury Pilot evaluates every grant proposal against your organization's constitution using consensus from multiple AI validators. Every decision comes with public reasoning your community can audit.
Grant review is broken in every grants program.
Reviews take days because every team member or delegate reads from scratch.
Decisions are inconsistent because no two team members or delegates apply the same rubric.
Approved grants disappear into a black hole until someone asks for a report.
There's no memory between proposals. Every decision starts blank.
Treasury Pilot fixes all four.
Three steps. Public reasoning at every step.
Define your constitution
Your organization's mission, grant programs, evaluation criteria, and red flags become a structured document. One source of truth. Every evaluation references this document.
Multiple AI validators reach consensus
Not one model deciding alone. Multiple validators evaluate independently, then agree on alignment, risk, and recommendation. If they disagree, that disagreement surfaces so you see exactly where the uncertainty is.
Your delegates/team members decide. Always.
Treasury Pilot is advisory infrastructure, never the decision-maker. Your delegates/team members see the AI's recommendation with full reasoning, similar past proposals, and risk assessment, then they vote. Auto-approval is opt-in, with veto windows for safety.
Built for both sides
Treasury Pilot works the same way whether you're running a grants program or applying for one.
Run your grants program with AI oversight
- 01Register your organization and publish your constitution.
- 02Configure auto-approval thresholds, veto windows, and invite admins.
- 03Watch proposals get AI-evaluated against your mission and programs.
- 04Track approved grants, review progress reports, and measure ROI.
Get funded with transparent, fair evaluation
- 01Browse organizations and find programs that align with your work.
- 02Submit a grant proposal targeting a specific program and amount.
- 03AI validators evaluate your proposal and publish public reasoning.
- 04Once approved, deliver milestones and submit progress reports.
Every evaluation looks like this.
Public. Auditable. Defendable.
Community workshop series on grant writing
The proposal directly serves the organization's mission of accessible grant education and targets an audience the Education Program was established to reach. Scope is well defined with concrete deliverables and a milestone-based timeline.
The team has prior contributions in the ecosystem with verifiable history. The requested budget is proportionalto the scope of work and fits comfortably within the program's remaining budget.
Risk is lowgiven the team's track record and the modest scope. Could benefit from more specific KPIs around workshop attendance and post-workshop outcomes. Consider requesting clarification before final vote.
Audit any decision. Always.